Why do so many employees escape the burden of being measured? Too often, we do not recognize the benefits that can result.
Operations personnel have long been scrutinized with intense measurement. Cost per unit, on-time delivery, defect percentage and efficiency rate are accepted and expected components of every operations professional’s career—and for good reason. Their output affects the satisfaction level of customers and the business’ bottom line. A company may lose valuable customers when products aren’t defect-free and delivered on-time or if they can’t provide their product or service cost effectively. Therefore, measuring operational performance is critical to a business’ survival.
Yet, doesn’t the same logic apply to engineering, purchasing, estimating, customer service, IT, HR and every other department in your company? Each function comes with its own cost, and all can impact the quality and timeliness of your organization’s goods or services. If the engineering department soaks up six days of a two-week lead-time or sends out a print with inaccurate data, operations will struggle. If purchasing substitutes a sub-standard material or keeps you waiting on supplies, the customer outcome is the same as when operators make a mistake.
The Double Standard
Why is there a double standard for who or what gets measured? The answer falls into four primary categories:
1) Unsure of what to measure
2) Too much variation
3) Too hard to capture the data (or can’t get data out of the computer system)
4) People won’t like it
Unsure of What to Measure? Start with Cost, Quality and Delivery.
Due to the broad scope of business operations employed today, it can be tough to determine the appropriate practices to measure, so we default to “variance to budget” or something of that nature. Or worse yet, we don’t measure at all. Instead, analyze each person’s area of performance in three separate categories: cost, quality and delivery.
For starters, evaluate your various business practices and determine which activities engage your employees the most. Attempt to determine the number of minutes or hours spent performing the tasks. If work activities are fundamentally different in terms of complexity or duration, track the time it takes to complete each task separately. This measurement should ultimately be proportionate to your cost for that function. Don’t worry about capturing every activity, just focus on capturing the most significant ones, whether it is from a quantity, time, frequency or business impact standpoint.
Next, determine how long it takes to complete each process; this will be your delivery metric. It’s important to track the total time to complete the process, not just the cycle-time of the individual operations. It may only take a couple of hours to do the actual work. Yet, if the job has been in your inbox since yesterday, that time needs to be included as well. Delivery metrics can be established between each department within a company (estimating to engineering to purchasing to operations to distribution to accounts receivable and anything else in between).
Thirdly, determine a good quality gauge for your output. Look both internally and externally to consider soliciting customers’ opinions. If your only feedback is customer complaints, count how many complaints you receive and divide that number by total customers served. If your department provides engineering prints, measure the number of errors from onset to approval. Computing quality measurements as a percentage generally tells the most complete story.
Too Much Variation? Take a Step Back From the Process.
Research & development and engineering departments are notorious for saying, “Every job is different. You can’t have a standard for how long it should take to design and create something.” These experts, by the nature of their roles, are extremely familiar with the ins and outs of the process. Such detailed knowledge can make it difficult for them to view the work in a simplistic manner that can be measured. It’s the old scenario, “Can’t see the forest through the trees.”
At times, defining a measurement strategy requires taking a step back from the process. We have one client, for example, that manufactures custom electronic measuring devices. They produce products according to exact customer specifications, and any given order may have only two or three of the same item. Some devices are produced only one time and then never made again. As a result, the client deals with literally thousands of SKUs and has trouble measuring their “job shop” production output. After all, coming up with a standard for each unique product would, legitimately, take more time than it is worth.
We were able to help the client identify a solution by taking a step back and looking at their production outputs differently. From a less detailed, more simplistic point of view they were typically taking steel boxes, punching out various holes, screwing in circuit boards, making cable connections, affixing labels, then hooking it up to a computer to download software. Obviously, in reality, the process was much more complicated and unique. But, for our purposes, a broader outlook enabled us to create some measurable standards. We calculated a standard number of labor hours for “simple,” “medium” and “complex” boxes and gave credit for each accordingly. This approach enabled us to categorize a variety of products and create viable productivity metrics. The standards that resulted allowed us to take further steps toward capacity planning and accurately predicting customer promise dates.
People will frequently attribute this sort of enlightenment to a “fresh set of eyes.” However, in this case, it’s not what fresh eyes SEE, it’s what we DON’T SEE (complexity, exceptions and other obstacles that stand in the way of a simple and surprisingly accurate solution).
Too Hard to Capture Data? Make an Effort Anyway, There’s Much Value in the Exercise.
Manually compiling tedious data into spreadsheets can be a daunting task. With so many employees performing so many unique tasks, tracking hours and quality errors may seem intimidating. Yet, learning to measure a process results in many unexpected benefits – and it doesn’t need to be overwhelming. Rather than compiling each task or complaint into a complicated system, it may be helpful to simply add a “tic mark” to track errors or specific, recurring problems. Just remember to only perpetuate the task as long as you’re using the data to drive solutions. If you cease to use it, your tracking system will serve only to burden your employees.
Consider challenging employees to come up with their own ways to gather data regarding cost, quality and delivery. This forces conversations that uncover areas of opportunity and gets people engaged in their work. Initially, a measurement system may seem worthless to your employees, and they may not immediately see the benefits of doing so. However, if someone actually turns data into information and uses it to solve problems or show recognition for efficient work habits, the effort to track it will be extremely worthwhile.
People Won’t Like It? Who Cares.
Employees, especially low performers, typically dread being measured. However, a good measurement shines a light into the shadows where many people “hide” in the workplace. Still, when initiating a new metric, start with positive reinforcement. Promote the good performance for a week or two – give low-performers a chance to “fix” the bad days on their own. This way, they won’t interpret the measurement as only punitive.
On the flip side, sometimes it is the people in charge who fight measurement, because it may highlight an ugly truth that they do not want to acknowledge. Such as finding out how low utilization is in their area or realizing that the on-time measurement is in single digits. Being aware of this tendency and knowing where you stand is a good first step, only then can you begin addressing your area’s problems.
Conclusion
In summary, there is no legitimate excuse for failing to administer operational measurements across your entire business. Having behavior-driving measurements at all levels that translate into company performance is one of the most significant advantages an organization can employ.
Many times, it takes a change in conditions, such as a new leader in the organization or being given a corporate initiative to act as a catalyst in creating objective measurements. The new leader simply doesn’t have time to learn one-by-one the subjective nuances of every product and every customer, the speed and efficiency of every person or the frequency that quality problems occur and why. Therefore, they put in place objective measurements to gauge how things are going in a few short moments. Similarly, corporate accountability is better monitored via numbers than it is through “explanations,” so an objective scoring system is required.
Developing a cost, quality and delivery measurement dashboard is essential for individual positions and for the organization as a whole. There is no such thing as a “protected class” anymore. In today’s competitive marketplace, everyone needs to be a part of the greater production plan. Though there may be some initial headaches from the exercise, the success that can be achieved by driving the right measurements will swiftly relieve us of our pain.