New Leader, Effective Change by Nick Williams, Managing Partner, Definity Partners

February 5th, 2010

How to Achieve Sustainable Operational Performance

A change in leadership can bring fear and uncertainty to an organization, and a new leader must defuse that to begin bringing about sustainable change.  And although new leaders must act quickly, they should not do so until they gain an understanding of the organization and the trust of its employee.

It is a mistake for a new leader to go in with preconceived solutions. Change needs to happen fairly quickly but not before the initial level of trust is built and the new leader gains an understanding of the opportunities the employees see and the obstacles they have faced. A new leader can create a culture of sustainable operational performance.

New Leaders Can Gain the Confidence of Long-Term Employees

When a new leader moves into that position, there are typically expectations of higher performance, so as soon as that leader can communicate those expectations to the organization, the better. It is important to convey that systems, processes and behaviors are going to have to change in order to achieve a higher level of performance. You really need to communicate that overall vision, that a higher standard is important, and then communicate why it is important in terms of your customers’ demands and what is changing in the marketplace.

Creating a Culture of Higher Performance

The CEO has to spend time one-on-one with the organization’s key leaders to understand their pain. Typically, these people want a higher level of performance as well. That really gives you the opportunity to start building trust with the team, as well as understand the landscape of the organization and what obstacles and opportunities exist. Change is scary, and new leadership can be frightening, so it is important to ask people what they are afraid of and address those fears head-on.

Implementing Operational Improvements

The most important thing is to identify the top four or five priorities you are going to work on. Then, you begin to challenge the status quo. Ask, ‘What would it take to create a higher level of performance?’ Then, to discuss solutions to the challenges, create a forum, which should include people across different functions in the organization, from front-line people to C-level positions.

Solutions should be sustainable and should aim to simplify, standardize and automate a process. First, to simplify, you need to eliminate waste in your processes. There is not a single area of an organization that does not deal with processes that have inherent waste and opportunities to eliminate it.

Once you simplify that process, standardize it so that you get a consistent outcome from now on. When an organization does not have standardized processes, it has difficulty moving past the same challenges because they continue to have different outcomes.

Finally, automate the process. Figure out how to take advantage of the technology you have at your disposal and how to leverage the system to automate those processes throughout the organization.

Encouraging Employees to Embrace Changes

You have to celebrate the trying. Even if you tried something and it did not work, it is still a win that you tried something different. If you are willing and open to trying different things, quick wins are going to come, but make sure that you celebrate not only the things you tried that worked really well but also when you tried something that did not work well. This will foster a culture of change at all levels of the organization.

Pitfalls New Leaders Make when Implementing Change

The first is not acting quickly enough. Many organizations are great at identifying their challenges and even at following through to develop solutions, but then they do not take quick, decisive action.

Another pitfall is failing to follow through. Many employees have heard the message in the past about maintaining a culture of continuous improvement, but it has not been followed through on. When improvements are not sustained, that responsibility resides with the leadership.

Finally, many leaders make the mistake of focusing on the draggers in an organization instead of on the performers. Focusing on the draggers and allowing them to maintain the status quo and not get involved in change is demotivating to the employees who are working hard to make improvements in the organization.

Ensuring the Culture of Operational Performance is Sustainable

Reward employees who are willing to drive change and identify solutions. Do not just have them go through the motions of attending a training class, but have them focus on external activities. Have them start to understand more about the external marketplace and really see other businesses and other business models.

They will come back with really great ideas, and one of the best ways to take advantage of training is to ask those employees to share their learning with others. You put them in a position of expertise with others, and that really starts to raise the average level of performance. Those people then become the removers of obstacles and the gatekeepers of resources, so that their leaders can then focus on improving and growing the business.

Achieving Sustainable Operational Improvements by Tara Amis, Education Coordinator, Definity Partners

January 22nd, 2010

Creating ‘Champions of Change’ Will Transform Your Organization

Organizational change to secure greater business results is never easy. Even when you are willing to create a culture that encourages it, you may worry that it cannot be sustained in the long run.

The biggest concern executives have as they invest resources in developing people and streamlining processes is, “Am I confident that these changes are going to last?” To ensure that you as a leader have confidence in your operational results, you must devote considerable time and money towards building the organization’s collective knowledge base so improvements can be sustained.

It is best to build an organization that persistently challenges the status quo and create a culture that continuously breeds ‘Champions of Change.’

Role of Front-Line Personnel in Achieving Sustainable Operational Improvements

Front-line personnel have the biggest impact on achieving higher productivity. These are the individuals who directly make the product or provide the service for the customer.  Therefore, they have the biggest impact on identifying wastes, eliminating costs and exceeding customer requirements. They are your most valuable resource; it is imperative to tap into your associates on the front-lines of your business.

At many organizations, management struggles with trying to figure out how to eliminate waste, but they are talking about it at a high level. Instead, you need to go to the people who have the information, but are sometimes not empowered to act. Often front-line personnel do not have the confidence to talk to management, or they think their ideas are not valued. You must create the environment to unleash their creativity in order to create ‘Champions of Change.’

Creating ‘Champions of Change’

You have to empower employees and give them the authority and ability to go out and make change – and the latitude to make mistakes.

People worry about their jobs, thinking, ‘What if I mess up? Am I going to get fired?’ You must remove that fear. People need to have the ability to go out and do something to try to make improvements, and if it does not work, to then try something else. Even if they come up with only a 50 percent solution, that’s still a lot better than a zero percent solution, you can continue to build even off the smallest of improvements.

You also need to give people who are higher up in your organization the tools to constantly reinforce, praise, mentor and give positive feedback to employees.

Leaders Should Encourage Sustainable Change

Offer benchmarking opportunities by taking employees to visit world-class organizations to look at other production floors or service centers. Learn directly by interacting with people responsible for running, highly efficient and effective operations. This will give everyone a better idea of your performance expectations.

Mentorship programs can also provide an opportunity to learn and create change. Because change must be driven from within the organization, providing mentors to develop ‘Champions of Change’ is critical as they go into new situations and face unanticipated roadblocks. This gives them an extra layer of support while they are implementing their first lean project so that they can succeed. You want your budding Champions to face roadblocks so they can learn from them, but you also want to make sure that when they are hit with one of these roadblocks, they know how to go around them.

Finally, offer continuing education to those who show initiative, promise and the desire to learn, and give these Champions additional tools and leadership development opportunities. They can then take those tools back to work, where they can implement them and influence others.

Education Develops People

Continuous reinforcement through training gives front-line personnel a knowledge base, increased confidence and an understanding of proven lean principles and tools. It also keeps them thinking of what is possible and keeps them motivated to achieve additional improvements.

In addition, Champions act as hands-on teachers in the workplace, conveying those tools and leadership skills on to their peers. They are taking the tools they have learned and are demonstrating desired behaviors. A lean mindset takes hold among the collective employees when they have someone they work with on a daily basis to model their actions.

Incorporating Lean Principles into Employees’ Daily Production Habits

First, you must implement a system of measuring and rewarding success. You can measure success by reviewing the continuous improvements employees are making and looking at how they are sharing their training and lean mentality with their co-workers. Employees who consistently perform well must be rewarded in various ways, from public praise to an increase in responsibilities to monetary rewards. Invest your corporate resources in your ‘performers’ to raise the performance bar for the remainder of your employees.

Management support and buy-in is critical in order to cultivate these ‘Champions of Change.’ Management can unintentionally quell operational improvements by not listening to their front-line personnel, or if they feel that they need to ‘get involved’ due to their lack of confidence in the system and people responsible for managing it.

You can give people the opportunity to improve, and they can have all the desire in the world, but if you do not have the support of your management at the executive level, change will not sustain. Management has to monitor results, but front-line personnel have to own sustainable change for greater performance.

Freeing the Leader to work ‘On’ Growing the Business by Dave Mills, Project Manager, Cincinnati

December 8th, 2009

I recently had the opportunity to have lunch with the president of one of our clients. The largest portion of this client’s customer base is located in the automotive industry; so, needless to say, the past year’s economic storm has had a negative financial impact on his company. However, very early into our conversation, I was struck by the positive and upbeat nature of his outlook for 2010.  Far from lamenting the lost sales and many cancelled orders in 2009, he was enthusiastic about the current opportunities facing the company. With genuine excitement, he shared with me that the altered landscape of their industry has put them in an optimal position to capture market share from their competitors. The reason their competitors have been weakened over the course of the year.

He proceeded to give me an overview of the new customers that they had been able to meet, which in normal circumstances would have been impossible due to long established supplier relationships. He credited the journey of sustained improvements begun two years prior that eliminated considerable operational wastes for these new business opportunities. As a result of confidence in front-line personnel that builds a culture of performance, the company has become vastly more competitive versus others in their industry. He even shared their plans to introduce new product lines into the marketplace and how their competition had nothing remotely as innovative on the horizon. He concluded our lunch with the statement that this year’s economic struggles were going to be one of the best things that ever happened to them.

Upon reflection of this discussion, I realized why this president was able to be so enthusiastic amidst the current economic malaise. It occurred to me that he, as the leader, is able to work “on” growing his business rather than “in” running his business. More importantly, he has not allowed the current market conditions to pull him deeper into the daily aspects of running the business. Rather as the leader he is able to dedicate his time towards growth initiatives that are currently yielding dividends for the company’s bottom-line.

In his best selling book, Leading Change, John Kotter’s first step demanded that leaders establish a sense of urgency for their organization. As our client pointed out over our sandwiches, if this economy is not creating a sense of urgency for you, then you must be dead. This successful leader reminds us to keep driving change to realize critical operational improvements.  Improvements that enable our companies to remain competitive while freeing management from daily oversight, allows them the time to implement growth strategies. Our client continues to adequately empower the employees to make the business operationally execute better, rather than simply maintaining the current status quo. This is due to his confidence, as the president of the company, in the people and systems, as validated through measurable outcomes. How many of us see the current, or any economic crisis for that matter, as an opportunity to generate the internal urgency to drive the necessary operational improvements in our companies?

Our client had already been working to establish a culture of continuous improvement throughout the organization long before the current economic downswing. He and his management team had worked hard to have the right people focusing on the right things for their business. They have thrived by maintaining management’s focus on their growth strategy, by communicating their performance expectations to the entire organization, engaging front-line employees to improve the operations without management’s daily oversight and properly rewarding their collective success. The business climate of this past year gave our client the opportunity to leverage the higher operational productivity that began years earlier.

The challenge that remains for business executives is to spend the majority of their time working “on” their business and not “in” it each day. It is never too late to begin the process of having the ability of management to primarily focus their efforts on growing the company. Do not wait for the storm clouds to completely clear in a couple of years – start today to achieve savings and confidence in your operations, thereby enabling you as the leader to focus on your company’s long-term growth.

Business Functions That Are Tough To Measure by John D’Agostino, Project Manager, Cincinnati

November 13th, 2009

Why do so many employees escape the burden of being measured? Too often, we do not recognize the benefits that can result.

Operations personnel have long been scrutinized with intense measurement. Cost per unit, on-time delivery, defect percentage and efficiency rate are accepted and expected components of every operations professional’s career—and for good reason. Their output affects the satisfaction level of customers and the business’ bottom line. A company may lose valuable customers when products aren’t defect-free and delivered on-time or if they can’t provide their product or service cost effectively. Therefore, measuring operational performance is critical to a business’ survival.

Yet, doesn’t the same logic apply to engineering, purchasing, estimating, customer service, IT, HR and every other department in your company? Each function comes with its own cost, and all can impact the quality and timeliness of your organization’s goods or services. If the engineering department soaks up six days of a two-week lead-time or sends out a print with inaccurate data, operations will struggle. If purchasing substitutes a sub-standard material or keeps you waiting on supplies, the customer outcome is the same as when operators make a mistake.

The Double Standard

Why is there a double standard for who or what gets measured? The answer falls into four primary categories:

1) Unsure of what to measure

2) Too much variation

3) Too hard to capture the data (or can’t get data out of the computer system)

4) People won’t like it

Unsure of What to Measure? Start with Cost, Quality and Delivery.

Due to the broad scope of business operations employed today, it can be tough to determine the appropriate practices to measure, so we default to “variance to budget” or something of that nature. Or worse yet, we don’t measure at all. Instead, analyze each person’s area of performance in three separate categories: cost, quality and delivery.

For starters, evaluate your various business practices and determine which activities engage your employees the most. Attempt to determine the number of minutes or hours spent performing the tasks. If work activities are fundamentally different in terms of complexity or duration, track the time it takes to complete each task separately. This measurement should ultimately be proportionate to your cost for that function. Don’t worry about capturing every activity, just focus on capturing the most significant ones, whether it is from a quantity, time, frequency or business impact standpoint.

Next, determine how long it takes to complete each process; this will be your delivery metric. It’s important to track the total time to complete the process, not just the cycle-time of the individual operations. It may only take a couple of hours to do the actual work. Yet, if the job has been in your inbox since yesterday, that time needs to be included as well. Delivery metrics can be established between each department within a company (estimating to engineering to purchasing to operations to distribution to accounts receivable and anything else in between).

Thirdly, determine a good quality gauge for your output. Look both internally and externally to consider soliciting customers’ opinions. If your only feedback is customer complaints, count how many complaints you receive and divide that number by total customers served. If your department provides engineering prints, measure the number of errors from onset to approval. Computing quality measurements as a percentage generally tells the most complete story.

Too Much Variation? Take a Step Back From the Process.

Research & development and engineering departments are notorious for saying, “Every job is different. You can’t have a standard for how long it should take to design and create something.” These experts, by the nature of their roles, are extremely familiar with the ins and outs of the process. Such detailed knowledge can make it difficult for them to view the work in a simplistic manner that can be measured. It’s the old scenario, “Can’t see the forest through the trees.”

At times, defining a measurement strategy requires taking a step back from the process. We have one client, for example, that manufactures custom electronic measuring devices. They produce products according to exact customer specifications, and any given order may have only two or three of the same item. Some devices are produced only one time and then never made again. As a result, the client deals with literally thousands of SKUs and has trouble measuring their “job shop” production output. After all, coming up with a standard for each unique product would, legitimately, take more time than it is worth.

We were able to help the client identify a solution by taking a step back and looking at their production outputs differently. From a less detailed, more simplistic point of view they were typically taking steel boxes, punching out various holes, screwing in circuit boards, making cable connections, affixing labels, then hooking it up to a computer to download software.  Obviously, in reality, the process was much more complicated and unique. But, for our purposes, a broader outlook enabled us to create some measurable standards. We calculated a standard number of labor hours for “simple,” “medium” and “complex” boxes and gave credit for each accordingly. This approach enabled us to categorize a variety of products and create viable productivity metrics. The standards that resulted allowed us to take further steps toward capacity planning and accurately predicting customer promise dates.

People will frequently attribute this sort of enlightenment to a “fresh set of eyes.” However, in this case, it’s not what fresh eyes SEE, it’s what we DON’T SEE (complexity, exceptions and other obstacles that stand in the way of a simple and surprisingly accurate solution).

Too Hard to Capture Data? Make an Effort Anyway, There’s Much Value in the Exercise.

Manually compiling tedious data into spreadsheets can be a daunting task. With so many employees performing so many unique tasks, tracking hours and quality errors may seem intimidating. Yet, learning to measure a process results in many unexpected benefits – and it doesn’t need to be overwhelming. Rather than compiling each task or complaint into a complicated system, it may be helpful to simply add a “tic mark” to track errors or specific, recurring problems. Just remember to only perpetuate the task as long as you’re using the data to drive solutions. If you cease to use it, your tracking system will serve only to burden your employees.

Consider challenging employees to come up with their own ways to gather data regarding cost, quality and delivery. This forces conversations that uncover areas of opportunity and gets people engaged in their work. Initially, a measurement system may seem worthless to your employees, and they may not immediately see the benefits of doing so. However, if someone actually turns data into information and uses it to solve problems or show recognition for efficient work habits, the effort to track it will be extremely worthwhile.

People Won’t Like It? Who Cares.

Employees, especially low performers, typically dread being measured. However, a good measurement shines a light into the shadows where many people “hide” in the workplace. Still, when initiating a new metric, start with positive reinforcement. Promote the good performance for a week or two – give low-performers a chance to “fix” the bad days on their own. This way, they won’t interpret the measurement as only punitive.

On the flip side, sometimes it is the people in charge who fight measurement, because it may highlight an ugly truth that they do not want to acknowledge. Such as finding out how low utilization is in their area or realizing that the on-time measurement is in single digits. Being aware of this tendency and knowing where you stand is a good first step, only then can you begin addressing your area’s problems.

Conclusion

In summary, there is no legitimate excuse for failing to administer operational measurements across your entire business. Having behavior-driving measurements at all levels that translate into company performance is one of the most significant advantages an organization can employ.

Many times, it takes a change in conditions, such as a new leader in the organization or being given a corporate initiative to act as a catalyst in creating objective measurements. The new leader simply doesn’t have time to learn one-by-one the subjective nuances of every product and every customer, the speed and efficiency of every person or the frequency that quality problems occur and why. Therefore, they put in place objective measurements to gauge how things are going in a few short moments. Similarly, corporate accountability is better monitored via numbers than it is through “explanations,” so an objective scoring system is required.

Developing a cost, quality and delivery measurement dashboard is essential for individual positions and for the organization as a whole. There is no such thing as a “protected class” anymore. In today’s competitive marketplace, everyone needs to be a part of the greater production plan. Though there may be some initial headaches from the exercise, the success that can be achieved by driving the right measurements will swiftly relieve us of our pain.

The New Economy by Jay Kuhn, President

October 30th, 2009

The “New Economy” is the trendy new term for the years ahead. We are all trying to anticipate what that means for us and how can we position our companies to adapt to whatever that “New Economy” will mean. Obviously even the best of economists cannot agree to what the future holds for us — unemployment holding or worsening, capital restricting or freeing, health care expanding or constricting, taxes growing a lot or a little and for whom, energy costs raising or lowering, the stock market up or down, the dollar strengthening or getting replaced. There is more confusion than ever. So how do we plan for a future that will more than likely challenge us as business leaders like we have never been challenged before?

There are many unknowns and uncontrollables in our current marketplace. The key to leadership is having a system that is most able to adapt. The number one criteria for success in the “New Economy” is the ability to have the most agile system. You are already seeing that play out with the recovery starting.

In the Auto Industry, “Cash for Clunkers” is an incredible temporary boom that created a shortage of vehicles and cash flow issues for the dealers. The dealers that were able to react quickly to getting more autos on their lots and had managed their cash well through the tough times were able to gain radically more sales from this boom. The ones who had low availability to inventory or poor cash positioning did not benefit.

This boom at the dealerships will now expose the auto company who is most able to react to a shortage at the dealers with the right inventory. The auto companies gearing up to a shortfall will then bleed down to the suppliers. Whichever organizations can react to the demand the fastest (and then probably quickly ratchet back down to “normal” demand levels) will be the ones that prosper.

The lessons that can be learned from this microcosm of our economy are vast.

  • Response Times – Whoever can react the fastest is in a great position to get the business. We have a customer that used to take five days to get quotes to their customers. They have historically competed with China and have a great niche of filling orders that are running late. Because of improvements, they are now able to give quotes over the phone. Typically in these situations, the purchasing person wants to find the first person that can deliver to avoid a shutdown or shortage. They are often willing to pay a premium for getting product. It starts, however, with the ability to get the cost to the buyer. The first “reasonable” price gets the order.
  • The “Right” Products – Meeting the customer’s ever changing needs are trickier than ever. Our R&D and new product development teams are racing to meet customer demands for new products. We still have an insatiable appetite for the latest and greatest, and companies who are able to quickly develop products, get them to market and obsolete them by introducing new products are going to thrive. That often creates some interesting dynamics in new product development. They like to use terms like “go, no-go,” decision gates, focus groups, milestone checking and the project plan. We are radically challenging the mindset of our new product development folks. The companies that innovate and the suppliers that can support them are going to be the successful companies of the next decade.
  • Ramp Up/Ramp Down – The ability to staff to proper levels will probably be one of the top needs of the “new economy.” With shorter lead times and a fickle customer, we are bound to have wide swings in our business. This does not sit well with most organizations. We have not created systems that allow us to quickly shift or train labor. The most successful organizations that we work with have incredible training programs, great processes for sharing/transferring labor and a workforce that is very adaptable to the business needs. Long gone are the days of doing one job day after day in one department. Businesses need employees that are very adaptable, and they have to have systems that create the adaptable employees.

I do not know what our future monetary policies will be or what our new health care plan will look like, but I do know that it is imperative that we are setting our organization up to be more adaptable to the needs of the consumers. This includes our ability to lead an organization that can have incredibly quick response times in operations and new product development and also has the ability to react to all types of demand levels. The leaders that understand this are the ones who are going to lead the successful organizations in the 2010’s.

Transforming People – WNKU BusinessWise Interview of Lynn McInturf, Lynn McInturf & Associates and Ray Attiyah, Definity Partners

October 16th, 2009

Transforming People. Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4.

Originally aired on Tuesday, September 7th and Wednesday, September 8th on 89.7 FM WNKU.  Broadcast as part of the BusinessWise feature during the Consider This program, heard weekdays from 5:00-5:30pm.

Run-Improve-Grow® is Even More Critical to Leaders, Especially in Today’s Challenging Business Environment by Mike Jarvis, Project Manager, Cleveland

October 9th, 2009

Current economic conditions are testing the leaders of many companies across multiple industries. We are hearing terms like “ride the storm out,” “hunker down” and “lay low.” The majority of executives are frustrated with their financial performance as businesses continue to cut their staff and ask their employees to do more.

Having the Right People Focused on the Right Responsibilities

I recently visited a client in the housing industry and talked with several employees from front-line operations to the president. A common theme emerged: managers should remain steadfast in allowing operational employees to oversee and be held accountable for improving production outcomes. This enables management to remain focused on overall process improvements and growth initiatives. This client previously had difficulty managing over 20 items with a four-week lead-time, where as today they are managing 350 items that are being shipped in a week. The management team consistently trains employees how to make day-to-day decisions to “run” the business, allowing the management team to look for areas of improvement and the leadership team to focus on growth into new markets, new products and new offerings. This client is now second in its market, closing quickly on becoming number one, growing in six years from $25MM to $170MM.

Another one of our clients is an automotive supplier. The company is down more than 50 percent in volume from the previous year. However, by having front-line personnel focused on operational improvements and executives being proactive in the marketplace, it acquired new business when its largest competitor was forced to close its doors. By previously aligning its production systems to handle complex products, this client was able to ramp up quickly to meet the new demand and deliver a high quality product. Being nimble in its operations has positioned it for projected record revenue levels this January, even in the face of the current automotive industry difficulties.

The Run – Improve – Grow Principle

“Run” is defined as the day-to-day activities that have to be executed consistently to effectively operate. If business systems are unproductive, executives have a tendency to constantly engage in “firefighting,” which keeps their eye away from potential opportunities or threats in the marketplace.

“Improve” occurs when companies instinctively challenge the status quo and realize it is dangerous not to constantly adapt. It is important for companies to continually examine their current operations in order to determine the best ways to eliminate waste and focus their time, money and energy on achieving better business outcomes.

“Grow” is looking outside your current business to areas of potential new markets, products and services to differentiate you from the competition. By becoming a solution for other’s problems and offering a unique selling proposition, your company can avoid simply being the lowest bidder.

Executives must spend the majority of their time in “Grow” and “Improve” activities.

Too often, when companies “hunker down,” the improvement and growth activities take a back seat due to fear of the unknown. Executives who cut only to control costs, or, worse yet, get involved with running the daily business activities, are putting their company’s long-term future in jeopardy. Successful business leaders are investing their time and energy in areas of improvement and growth to prosper, even in the face of a challenging business environment.

The leaders of the two highlighted companies are engaging their employees and eliminating to the obstacles that are preventing them from optimal job performance. They are empowering their employees to address issues before they become real problems and working to develop confidence in their employees by setting performance expectations and providing them the tools to achieve desire results.

Successful businesses continuously invest in leadership development and process improvement. For example, the housing industry client mentioned earlier had their changeovers go from six hours to 30 minutes. How? By listening to operators and involving them in the solution. The team was able to organize pre-build changeover kits and implement SMED techniques to make radical improvements, enabling it to now complete 12 times more setups without impacting production.

As the Run Improve Grow Principle takes hold in a company, the executive leadership team can focus on growth opportunities due to the high confidence in the operational process. They have time to think about what separates them from the competition. Too often, executives get distracted by working “in” the businesses instead of “on” the business. In order to achieve long-term success, business leaders must engage clients to understand their needs and anticipate industry trends. Business leaders must keep asking themselves these simple questions -

  1. I have confidence in WHO ?
  2. I need to let go of WHAT ?
  3. I am going to do it by WHEN ?

After they are done, they do it again and again until the right people are focused on the right activities.  They also must insist that their direct reports do the same.

I recently met with a company struggling to adapt to today’s economic conditions. I had the company president participate in this simple exercise. We discovered that he was spending too much time settling disputes between a department manager and a supervisor.  This operational dysfunction was causing him to spend valuable time and energy on running the business on a daily bases rather than focusing on critical, future growth opportunities.

The market is on the side of the business leaders preparing for tomorrow.  So what are you spending your time on today? Are you running or growing your business? Whether you are a line leader or a president, you can take action today and start making a difference. By developing confidence in your team, you can meet the changing conditions of today’s economy and continue to grow your business.

Process Improvement: If You Think It Is Only For Manufacturing, Think Again by Dave Mills, Project Manager, Cincinnati

September 25th, 2009

Process improvement has traditionally been associated with manufacturing. Yet, most if not all businesses can benefit from looking at how they operate and finding new ways to increase productivity.

All industries can learn from manufacturers. Proven implementation methods and process improvement tools can be applied to any organization, in any industry or with operational and process functions.

Organizations in All Industries Can Learn from Manufacturers about Process Improvement.

If you have costs pressures while your revenue is going down, working on operational efficiency is a must. Global economic realities forced manufacturing to lead the way towards achieving operational improvement. To remain profitable, the majority of manufacturers have simplified, standardized and automated their operations. Now, other industries are employing lean principles, especially health care organizations.

As the national health care debate continues, health care organizations must streamline themselves to take costs out of the system. This is illustrated in a recent USA Today article, which discusses why hospitals must cut costs by improving efficiency and reducing waste by leveraging proven lean principles.

Additionally, technological advancements have caused several industries to begin working on their operational efficiencies. They are being impacted by innovation, creating another opportunity to evaluate processes and identify potential opportunities.

Even nonprofits can benefit from process improvement. With the current economic challenges, their revenue is going down while their costs are going up, and the number of constituents they are serving is increasing. By streamlining their processes, they can trim waste and operate more efficiently with fewer resources.

Involving Employees Drive Improvement Results.

All industries are realizing that getting their people involved is key to understanding process challenges on a daily bases. This perspective is key to understanding what is holding them back from being able to implement improvements. It does not matter whether you are in manufacturing or another industry, having your people involved is the key to driving and creating sustainable improvements.

Process Improvement Techniques in Service Industries.

Any activity involving the customer‘s experience must be evaluated. Think about what your customer wants – whether it is a manufacturing company looking to reduce product delivery time, a medical practice eliminating the time patients are kept in the waiting room or a nonprofit anticipating more service demand. If you start with the customer, you are going to be focusing on the right things.

A proven technique is our ‘run, improve, grow’ model. It is a way of understanding how your employees are looking at what they do on a daily basis. Are they working on making improvements in the business, and are they looking at ways to grow the organization? As you work on making improvements that can help you with the way that you are running, you start to remove waste in the process. This gives you more time to focus on improvements and organizational growth.

Determining When to Undertake a Process Improvement Initiative.

The challenge is that you always can find a reason not to begin an improvement initiative – you are facing new competition, market demand is changing, new products are being introduced or something else. With that said, the best time to initiate change is before you are forced to by market conditions. Being proactive in improvements is always better than a reactive response.

Take an example of merging nonprofits. They leveraged that opportunity to spend time improving their processes. It would have been very easy to say, ‘We should not do that now because we are merging and we are too busy.’ Instead, they looked at it the other way and said, ‘Now is as good a time as any. We are going to be making changes anyway, so let’s take this as an opportunity to look at our process, eliminate some of the waste in there and take the best of both worlds and bring them together.’

Do not wait until there are problems or only focus on the top of your organization. You really need to take every opportunity to involve your most valuable employees who are on the front lines to take your processes to the next level.

The Benefits of a Process Improvement Effort.

The number one key deliverable is that it needs to make financial sense. No matter what industry you are in, there is always an opportunity to address the bottom line. Focus on increasing productivity, cutting defects and/or reducing operational costs.

What often can be even more important and impactful, however, is creating that culture where you can continually drive and sustain process improvements. It is not just when you are working on a project; you need to create a culture where motivating employees allows you to continue to drive improvements throughout the organization. Success in measured on never being complacent to achieve better results.

In the end, it allows you to be more competitive so that you are not just reacting to the economy or the competition, but you are being proactive with the continuous improvement culture that you created to drive operational excellence.

Inefficiency: Caused By Employees or an Effect of Management Issues? by Dave Satcher, Project Manager, Cincinnati

September 11th, 2009

We seem to live in a world that is filled with taking the easy way out when things are not going as we expect. Placing blame for inefficiency in organizations is really no different. Employees are quick to point out how most of the issues they fight come from management, and, in turn, management is quick to point out that the employees are to blame. It is a vicious circle of excuses; the unfortunate part is that these inefficiencies hurt all involved in the process, including the most important part of the equation: the customer. Blame can certainly be put on both parties, and, truthfully, it boils down to being accountable to putting forth your best effort in every part of your job, regardless of whether you are a leader or follower.

Over the years of discovering where inefficiencies are in organizations and, more importantly, figuring out ways to make improvements that can eliminate these sins, I have discovered that there are three common causes for organizational inefficiencies:

· Leaders feel compelled to solve everyone’s problems

· Leaders are frightened to lose control in the organization

· Leaders do not understand the power of cultural transformations

These three findings are not the end all or, for that matter, the cure for removing all inefficiencies and waste in an organization. However, overcoming these issues can strongly impact improvement efforts.

Leaders Feel Compelled to Solve Everyone’s Problems

Think back to the way you were raised as a child. I am sure everyone has heard his or her parents say, “If I want something done right, then I have to do it myself.” Apply this thought to the organization where you work. I am willing to bet that this same phrase has been repeated more times than you or I care to count. Managers in organizations often have a belief that they were hired to solve problems and get results. Maybe this can be blamed on our parents; however, my experience tells me that people get their sense of value from the positions they hold. People truly believe that if they are the one that solves problems, then they add value and are doing a great job. As the saying goes, “My best firefighter is my chief arsonist.”

Leaders need to understand that by giving employees the ability to solve problems, improvements can multiply at an exponential rate. I know from my own personal experience that this is not an easy task to do, but I have also witnessed how much stronger an organization can be when everyone becomes a decision maker. My recommendation is that you start small, because trust will be an issue as you begin to change your ways and people will not be sure of your intentions.

Leaders are Frightened to “Lose Control” in Their Organization

This almost seems like a paradox, because the purpose of our jobs is often to gain control of situations. Most managers are hired because they have an innate ability in their chosen field to “take charge and run the show.” Here in lies the paradox: gaining control comes through giving up control. This does not mean we do not lead our areas, but rather it means we must be able to train those we lead to become leaders. True leadership is the ability to get results through others and then train them to do the same thing. Most inefficiency issues that are prevalent today can be tied back to the fear of losing control, because many managers are concerned that allowing others to take ownership will discount their duties.

There is one common thread seen in any organization that excels at integrating employees into continuous improvements: everyone is expected to perform. By this, I mean actively participate and share both the good and bad ideas for success. When the leaders nourish and encourage this type of activity, it becomes hard to stop the snowball effect that occurs. People that understand the value of teaching and coaching employees generally lead organizations that follow this process.

Leaders Do Not Understand How Powerful Cultural Transformations Can Be

In order to ensure that inefficiencies can be curtailed, managers must realize that which can be difficult to grasp. There is often a self-fulfilling prophecy that exists within organizations: managers that struggle to see the value in having employees actively participate have never lived through the results that can be achieved when they empower employees. When your whole focus has been trying to protect your turf or knowing all the answers to everyone’s issues, you become blind to understanding the impact your employees can make in the organization.

Generally, the toughest part of overcoming this problem is effective communication between managers and employees. The easiest way to solve this is to pick an area where effective results can be made quickly and to find a leader that is open to getting employees involved. Senior leadership should then openly communicate their vision, which should center around a culture of continuous, employee driven improvement. In order to implement this, they must commit the resources and openly support and encourage this behavior.

Final Thoughts

Business conditions today mandate the need for a change in how we operate. The importance of this task is now greater than it has ever been. Breaking the engrained culture most organizations have around employee involvement is no easy task, but success can only happen when we try something. Good leaders recognize that overcoming inefficiencies that are prevalent in most organizations takes commitment and dedication from all levels in the organization. It becomes easier to see that a team with all members pulling their weight and contributing will have a better chance of survival than organizations that continue to operate in the old ways. Managers that truly become leaders will quickly ask themselves, “Why did I wait so long to engage my employees?”

The Need for Speed: Building Early Momentum on the Path to Continuous Improvement by Tom Shaw, Project Manager, Atlanta

August 28th, 2009

One of the often underappreciated keys to a successful continuous improvement effort is getting off to a fast start. It is not a coincidence that in baseball the leadoff hitter is often very fast and a good base stealer. Baseball managers know that getting runners in scoring position early helps to build momentum and get runs on the board early. The same holds true in continuous improvement efforts.

Think of the projects that you have been associated with in the past that dragged on for months. Did you find yourself in long planning sessions? Was the team hesitant to implement until all the details had been flushed out and the perfect mousetrap created? When you finally did implement, did the plan come together exactly as scripted, or did you have to make adjustments along the way to get where you needed to go?

In my experience, speed is critical to your success on projects because of what it gains you. There are numerous benefits, but in particular I’d like to focus on four:

  • Momentum in the Effort
  • Early Wins on the Board
  • Confidence for the Team
  • Credibility to the Effort

Momentum in the Effort

Momentum in a project is critical. Inertia is one of those concepts we were taught in grammar school that has a lot of value in continuous improvement projects: “a body at rest stays at rest.” I have been involved in projects in the past that stalled and could not get restarted. When I look back at them now, I realize that we had not gained momentum early and, therefore, were fighting an uphill battle the rest of the way. At some point, those initiatives went away because they stalled. These projects may be referred to as “flavors of the month.”

Contrast those with the projects that have been successful, and I bet “a body in motion continues in motion” is a better description of that project. For example, with one client we were putting a tool crib in place. During the first day, we collected over 2,500 tool holders and had a skeleton layout in place. By the end of the first week, although not fully functional, we were already issuing tools out of the tool crib to operators on the floor. The project took off like a rocket, and we never looked back. Although there were hiccups along the way, the speed that we started with created such a tide of momentum that our team faced all challenges with an attitude that we could not be stopped. Once that boulder started rolling down the mountain, it was awfully hard to stop.

Early Wins on the Board

Early wins for your team are a natural by-product of speed. In the tool crib example, the visual change to the shop floor (removal of excess, cluttered tooling) and establishment of an organized area for issuing tools gained early wins for the team. People were able to see the results with their own eyes. The project began to get legs of its own. Everybody likes a winner; other people started to get on board and the effort continued to gain speed and momentum. I am not downplaying the necessity for planning. However, planning sessions too often drag far longer than necessary. The longer it takes to get into implementation, the longer before you see results.

Confidence for the Team

Fast starts breed confidence. Teams feed off success; thus, the early wins bolster their confidence. My experience with teams and organizations has shown time and again that confidence is infectious. Employees get a taste of success and they want more of it. These groups no longer hope to win but are now conditioned to expect it. They are more equipped to face adversity head-on and beat it than teams that have not yet tasted success.

Credibility for the Effort

Credibility for the effort is built around all the previous points. Early wins and confidence build a reputation for the team involved and the effort as a whole. This credibility is important up the chain of command, as well as within the group of people that we are working with on the effort who may not be part of the core team. People are more apt to get engaged with projects where they are seeing results. Equally as important, when we are faced with new obstacles that present challenges, our past credibility will help people believe that we can overcome them. After all, our previous wins have already demonstrated our ability to do so.

How do you get off to a fast start? Here are some techniques and approaches that have proven to be very effective with the numerous clients who we have worked with over the years:

  1. Trystorming
  2. Measurements
  3. Huddles
  4. Physical Changes
  5. Action Item Lists

Trystorming

Trystorming is at the core of what we do at Definity Partners. It is a key component of speed and gaining early momentum that is crucial to success. Everyone is familiar with brainstorming: getting a group of people together and throwing out ideas. The concept is great; unfortunately, it is the rare brainstorming session that generates actionable items. More often than not, you find yourself in another brainstorming session covering the same ground as the previous meeting. Trystorming takes brainstorming to the next level. It requires us to flush out the ideas for improvement and implement them quickly. Test the merits of the ideas, and then tweak them as required. By doing this, you begin to reap the benefits immediately. For example, trystorming an idea that gets you 50% towards your goal right off the bat translates to a 50% increase over what you are currently doing.

Measurements

Measurements drive behaviors and creating the right behaviors will get the results you are after. The best measures I have seen are real-time, easy to calculate and located in the area where you are making the improvements. A white board and a dry erase marker are great for these types of measurements. Let the people doing the work update the board routinely. This gives them ownership in the process and also provides real-time feedback about how they are doing.

Huddles

Huddles are a great tool that only requires commitment and time. When running huddles, I routinely cover three things: measurements, what went well and what went poorly. A good huddle will typically last a short time period, often under ten minutes, and the results can be extremely powerful. It keeps what you are doing at the forefront of your team’s mind and, equally as important, how you are doing toward your stated goal. The discussion of what went well celebrates the successes of the team and highlights behaviors that we want to repeat. Discussions about what went poorly become the basis for creating the trystorming ideas that will take you to the next level.

Physical Changes

We have previously touched on what a powerful mechanism physical changes can be in energizing your effort and building that early momentum critical to long-term success. Most adults are visual creatures; therefore, visual improvements are an easy way to communicate that a change is occurring. Organizing a work area through 5S, setting up manufacturing cells and visual measurements in the focus area are all examples of physical changes that can be done quickly, in one week or less. The best projects that I have been involved with over the years have always had dynamic physical changes occur during the first couple of weeks.

Action Item Lists

Finally, action items provide a means of tracking progress and creating a roadmap to follow on the path of continuous improvement. I have seen hand-written sheets, white boards in war rooms, Excel spreadsheets and detailed project lists with gantt charts. The format is less important than documenting the items to be done. Ensure that you have the action item, responsible party and the date due. Do not allow TBDs; they are a recipe for disaster. Create a deadline and hold each other accountable to produce. Action item lists also provide a fantastic way to show the team where you have been and how much you have accomplished along the way.

Continuous improvement efforts are challenging under the best of circumstances. By following these simple but effective guidelines, you can ensure that you and your team get off to a fast start. Best of luck on your journey!